| Most Recent Comments - MNM Partners | ||
|---|---|---|
| Date | Company | Comment |
| 07/21/2016 | G8 Capital | Reviewing -- pwitham |
| 07/19/2016 | Canyon Capital Realty Advisors | On vacation until 7/25 -- pwitham |
| 07/19/2016 | Township Capital | Reviewing Packages - Interested in potential GP role -- pwitham |
| 07/19/2016 | Thorofare Capital | PASS - Primarily due to the low in place DY for both properties as they need to get to 500-550 spread (i.e. 5% + DY). (They closed Buckingham Apartments (same Redwood City submarket)(basis was $244k key off initial funding. $11.7mm/48 units)). -- pwitham |
| 07/19/2016 | Silverpoint Capital | PASS: Not comfortable with rent appreciation strategy - value needs to be created in other way. -- pwitham |
| 07/19/2016 | RMA | Real Estate Investment Advisors | PASS - Cannot get comfortable with the exit cap and so returns fall away at that point. Too much upside in acquisition pricing. Lack of institutional buyer on exit. Not comfortable with multiple buildings. Negative cashflow for extended period due to high leverage - but deal is too thin so putting in more equity kills returns. -- pwitham |
| 07/18/2016 | Center Square Investment Management | PASS: No institutional exit possible, too expensive on the acquisition - cannot do 8-foot ceiling/ zero commodities and if a down-turn hits how that asset compete at those rent projections. -- pwitham |
| 07/15/2016 | AIG Global Real Estate | PASS: Too small of deal size and vintage of assets is not of interest. Sponsorship too new. -- pwitham |
| 07/15/2016 | TIAA - CREF | PASS - Too small/Too old of vintage. -- pwitham |
| 07/15/2016 | Grannum Capital | They are looking at this deal from a potential GP angle only. -- pwitham |